Author: Kate Quinn
Date of Publication: April 6 2010
Pages: 470
Source: Mari

Thea is a slave girl from Judaea, passionate, musical, and guarded. Purchased as a toy for the spiteful heiress Lepida Pollia, Thea will become her mistress's rival for the love of Arius the Barbarian, Rome's newest and most savage gladiator. His love brings Thea the first happiness of her life-that is quickly ended when a jealous Lepida tears them apart.

As Lepida goes on to wreak havoc in the life of a new husband and his family, Thea remakes herself as a polished singer for Rome's aristocrats. Unwittingly, she attracts another admirer in the charismatic Emperor of Rome. But Domitian's games have a darker side, and Thea finds herself fighting for both soul and sanity. Many have tried to destroy the Emperor: a vengeful gladiator, an upright senator, a tormented soldier, a Vestal Virgin. But in the end, the life of the brilliant and paranoid Domitian lies in the hands of one woman: the Emperor's mistress.

Review:

Mistress of Rome is another book Mari recommended I read. I wasn't as enamoured with it as she was, but I appreciate reading a book out of my normal genre.

First, I wonder if my opinion is affected at all by the fact that I read 100 pages over the course of a week, and then I binge read the rest of the novel. I have a bit of a headache now and I can't help thinking the story is incredibly long. It's a drama with various elements, and at the beginning I was very interested in it. I was curious to see what would happen, and frankly I never read adult so this was completely out of my comfort zone.

I understand the story is very plot based which might be why I didn't fully connect with any of the characters. I felt kind of distant from them. Throughout the novel, many of them encountered new situations and became new people and I thought the time lapses were fascinating because I got to experience their lives. There were some characters, namely Lepida, that I prayed would die very early because she was so irritating. There was nothing redeeming about her character, and to be honest that's not something I like in a book. I kept having to read in the perspective of an absurdly irritating character.

There were some things I would have liked to know more about. For example, Arius said he had a 'black demon" inside of him and this was something never fully explored. I wondered what it was- was he mentally ill? Where did it come from? I guess I just wanted some elaboration on that part of him. Thea was the main protagonist and objectively I like her but emotionally I didn't feel too much.

I guess after a while because I wasn't invested in the characters, especially in the last fifth of the book, I was just hoping it would end. The story just became too much of a drama and it wasn't realistic to me. I despised reading Lepida's POV and I couldn't connect with some of the characters' choices.

The biggest villain of the story was despicable, but I never felt I had a grasp on their personality. The ending was warranted, and to be honest I didn't feel any sense of victory. It was more like, "Finally! The rat is dead."

Mistress of Rome felt like a really long read without a really specified overall plot. The story kind of dips and curves as it's about peoples' lives in ancient Rome rather than being a story about a specific plot. It's so long and I didn't like that because I was very tired of it by the end. I would expect that this book isn't meant to be a one sit read. But I read it in three chunks, and I realized quickly that it's not a page turner. It's the type of book that's probably meant to be read slowly, in little installments. I don't read like that, and so this isn't my type.

The other side is that although the story takes place in Rome, Mistress of Rome is a drama. I haven't read much about ancient Rome however, so it was a lot of fun to look at the different world that existed back then. I don't know enough about Rome to comment on the accuracy of the world building but to me it seemed very good.

Overall, Mistress of Rome is a different book from the type I usually read, and I enjoyed trying it out. Long winded dramas aren't really my type though, and it gets 3 stars because by the end I was just skimming some parts desperately wishing the story was over. I feel like a true testament to a quality book is one where each sentence feels beautiful and while Mistress of Rome started strong, I felt like by the end I had satisfied my craving for something new and I was completely done with the story. If you're more of a contemporary reader and romance lover, with some respect for historical reads I think you'll enjoy this one. Just remember to take it slowly. 3 stars.

-P.E.

I feel like a broken record always citing my love of history as a reason behind my interest in historical fiction. But there is so much more to historical fiction than just history. Sure there are the nobles: kings, knights, queens. But it's the infamous that attract me, and what is better than a gladiator?

I'm currently reading Mistress of Rome by Kate Quinn, an adult historical fiction that revolves around a Jewish slave girl and a Britannic gladiator. What an interesting match up, it's heartbreaking no less.

Rome was an important stepping stone in humanity's past and their ingenious inventions are things to be admired. But like most early humans, they were a savage and tough people. I don't know how else to describe a population who spent their Sundays watching men and women being skinned by vicious animals and cheering for their downfall.

However, that was the way of life in ancient Rome and a well documented one as well. Many know of the Romans and their accomplishments. We know of crazy Nero who played his lyre while Rome burned or of Caligula who despised the Senate so much he named his favourite horse a senator. No doubt they were ridiculous leaders but how about the people below them? The gladiators forced to put down their lives for their entertainment?

Honestly, it was probably a horrible fate and I wouldn't wish it on anyone, but like other not too noble occupations like: assassins (Assassin Creed) and thieves (Robin Hood), gladiators are romanticized and incredibly interesting to read about.

• They know any fight can be their last.
• They are tough men and women from across the world.
• They wish for a rudius, an Emperor's grant of freedom.
• They are the object of many's fancy.
• But, they are slaves (not all).
• Barbarians

It's a mystery how they managed to live and how the men and women that loved them coped after their death.

I've just started to make a dent in Mistress of Rome but gladiators seem to be the super stars of the Romans. They were slaves whose lives were forfeit in the Colosseum but outside they were peppered with noble women, fans and graffiti.

It's kind of sad that I have to travel outside the YA genre to find a book that interested me and captured Rome in a realistic and detailed fashion. There are definitely a fantastic bunch of YA historical fiction authors who do this phenomenally but none to my knowledge who wrote about gladiators. Wouldn't it be a great new craze? Vamps, werewolves, angels, zombies to gladiators!

What do you think of gladiators? 

-Mari